Signin Signup

redacted

This post was last updated for 210 days ago, and the information may already be changed

redacted

2 Operate

SternCat updated this article at 2025-05-09 20:46:41

SternCat updated this article at 2025-04-10 07:37:59

2 Operate

6 Reply

1.9k 77 46 101 1 1 1.7k

6 Reply

redacted

Welcome to here!

Here we can learn from each other how to use SiYuan, give feedback and suggestions, and build SiYuan together.

Signup About

Please input reply content ...

SternCat • 7 months
VIP Warrior Author

Matrix is not at all privacy focused, it leaks metadata, has state resolution issues, and is a metadata disaster.

Instead of complaining about the various phobias like a social justice warrior, you could spend your time auditing the code.

1 Reply
MiscReply
SternCat • 7 months • 1
VIP Warrior Author

I reviewed the code and it seems you proved me wrong in my initial assessment. Good job
SternCat • 7 months • 1 Comment
VIP Warrior Author

It's so bad it feels like a backdoor... in a Chinese product?!?! No way that would never happen :P

1 Reply

You don't understand the code logic yourself but just blurt out nonsense. Pretending to know when you don't and throwing around accusations is extremely ridiculous. First, you should brush up on your knowledge.

congsec • 7 months
kxra • 7 months
VIP Warrior

Do you just cry social justice warrior to ignore double standards and the fact that you couldn't even understand the code you looked at?

Anyways, Matrix is a protocol with many implementations, and the spec is improving to address those issues, so I'm not sure what your point is unless you think there is a better distributed graph database synchronization protocol.
Visit all replies

SternCat